Old and New London, A Narrative of its History, its People and its Places. Illustrated with Numerous Engravings from the Most Authentic Sources. vol 2
Thornbury, Walter
1872-78
Chapter LIV: The Old Bailey.
Chapter LIV: The Old Bailey.
There is some dispute as to the origin of the name for while some think it implies the Ballium, or outer space beyond the wall, Maitland refers it to Bail Hill, an eminence where the bail, or bailiff, lived and held his court. Stow thinks the street was called from some old court held there, as, in the year , the tenement and ground upon , between Ludgate on the south and Newgate on the north, was appointed to John Cambridge, fishmonger and Chamberlain of London, he says,
| |
Strype describes the [extra_illustrations.2.462.2] as a fair and stately building, very commodious, and with large galleries on both sides for spectators, he remarks, A Court-house was erected here in . It was | |
destroyed in the Riots of , but was rebuilt and enlarged in by the addition of the site of the old Surgeons' Hall. | |
The old constitution of this court for malefactors is given by in Strype (v. ). he says,
| |
p.463 | . Handcuffs and Feetlocks, and Padlock to Ground. . cell over the Castle, Jack Sheppard fastened to the floor. Climbing up the Chimney, where he found a bar of iron. . Red Room over the Castle, into which he got out of the Chimney. . Door of the Red Room, the lock of which he put back. . Door of the Entry between the Red Room and the Chapel. . Door going into the Chapel, which he burst open. . Door going out of the Chapel towards the Leads. . Door with a Spring Lock, which he opened. . Door over the same Passage. . The Lower Leads. . The Higher Leads, the walls of which he got over, and descended by the staircase off the roof of a turner's house into the street. |
p.464 | |
Under the general title, are joined both what are called the Old Court and the New. The former deals with the more weighty cases-those of deepest dye-and has echoed, without doubt, to more tales of the romance of crime than any other building in the kingdom. | |
says Mr. Timbs (),
| |
The court is regulated by Act of Parliament and Will. IV., c. . | |
As to the number of persons who are brought here into public notice, Mr. Sheriff Laurie, writing to the of says,
| |
Trials are going on at the almost all the year round. Frequent, however, as they are, there are occasional pauses. Justice, it has been said, must nod sometimes, and therefore it is as well to provide for fitting repose elsewhere than on the judgment-seat. The sittings of the [extra_illustrations.2.464.2] are held monthly, but as the whole of the month is not occupied in the trial of the prisoners on the calendar, the spare time forms a vacation, and such are the only vacations at the . In consequence of these frequent sittings, trials are often conducted and prisoners rewarded according to their merits, with surprising swiftness. A criminal may be guilty of theft in the morning, be apprehended before night, be committed by a magistrate the next day, and the day after that be tried, convicted, and sentenced at the Old Bailey--a speedy administration of justice, which must be highly gratifying to all concerned. | |
says Fielding, writing of the increase of robbers,
| |
The interior of the Old Court, which, naturally enough, from every point of view is more interesting than that of the New , has been described in a lively manner by a writer in Knight's (). he says, The court formerly sat at the early hour of a.m. | |
In , both the Old Court and the were ventilated, upon Dr. Reid's plan, from chambers beneath the floors, filled with air filtered from an apartment outside the building, the air being drawn into them by an enormous discharge upon the highest part of the edifice, or propelled into them by a fanner. From the entire building the vitiated air is received in a large chamber in the roof of the Old Court, whence it is discharged by a gigantic iron cowl, feet in diameter, weighing tons, and the point of the arrow of the guiding vane weighing . The subterrannean air-tunnels pass through a portion of the old city wall. | |
It was at the , in , that Richard Savage, the dissolute poet, for whom Dr. Johnson seems to have felt an affection, was tried. The poet was out, night, drinking and rioting with gentlemen named Merchant and Gregory, when they agreed to turn in at Coffee House, near . Merchant, demanding a room in a bullying way, was told there was a fire ready-made in the next partition, where the company were about to leave. The men at once rushed in, and placed themselves between the fire and the persons who were there, and kicked down a table. A fight ensued, and Savage ran a Mr. James. Sinclair through the body. He also wounded a servant-girl who tried to hold him, and broke his way out of the house. He was taken, however, in a back court, where some soldiers had come to his assistance. The next morning the revellers were carried before the justices, who sent them to the Gate House, and on the death of Mr. Sinclair they were removed to Newgate. They were not, however, chained, and were placed apart from the vulgar herd in the press-yard. It was proved that the fatal stab was given by Savage, and he was consequently found guilty of murder. It is said that his supposed mother, the Countess of Macclesfield, did all she could to bring Savage to the gallows; but the Countess of Hertford, Lord Tyrconnel, and Mrs. Oldfield, the actress, obtained for him at last the king's pardon. | |
Among other celebrated criminals who have been tried at the and Central Criminal Courts, may be briefly mentioned the following:-- Major Strangways, the assassin, in ; Colonel Turner and his family, for burglary in , ; Green, Berry, and Hill, for the murder of Sir Edmundbury Godfrey, ; Count Koningsmark and others for the assassination of Mr. Thynne, ; rowland Walters and others, for the murder of Sir Charles Pym, Bart., ; Harrison, for the murder of Dr. Clenche, ; Beau Fielding, for bigamy, ; Richard Thornhill, Esq., for killing Sir Cholmeley Deering in a duel, ; the Marquis di Paleotti, for the murder of his servant in , ; Major Oneby, for killing in a duel, and ; Jonathan Wild, the thief-taker, ; the infamous Colonel Charteris, ; Elizabeth Canning, an inexplicable mystery, ; Baretti, for stabbing, ; the Perraus, for forgery, ; the Rev. Mr. Hackman, for shooting Miss Reay, ; Ryland, the engraver, for forgery, ; Barrington, the pickpocket, ; Renwick Williams, for stabbing, ; Theodore Gardelle, for murder, ; Hadfield, for shooting at George III., ; Captain Macnamara, for killing Colonel Montgomery in a duel, ; Aslett, the Bank clerk, for forgery on the Bank to the extent of , | |
p.466 | ; Holloway and Haggerty, for murder, ; Bellingham, the assassin of Mr. Spencer Percival, ; Cashman, the sailor, for riot on (where he was hanged), ; Richard Carlile, for blasphemy, and ; St. John Long, the counter-irritation surgeon, for manslaughter, and ; Bishop and Williams, for murder by ; Greenacre, for murder, ; G. Oxford, for shooting at the Queen, ; Blakesley, for murder in , ; Beaumont Smith, for forgery of Exchequer bills, ; J. Francis, for an attempt to shoot the Queen, ; McNaughten, who shot Mr. Drummond in mistake for Sir R. Peel, ; Dalmas, for murder on , ; Barber, Fletcher, &c., for willfor- geries, ; Manning and his wife, for murder, ; Palmer, the Rugeley poisoner, whose trial lasted a fortnight, ; and pirates, convicted of murder on the high seas, within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty of England, . |
But besides those criminals, outcasts of society, and notorious for their evil deeds, the has disposed of another class, distinguished by their noble and elevated principles, and famed for their patriotism. Here were tried, in , immediately after the Restoration, those of the judges of Charles I. who were still alive, and, relying on the promised bill of indemnity, had remained in England; and years later, in the same reign, a nobleman whose name has become a household word--in connection with his illustrious friend, Sidney-Lord William Russell. | |
The trial of the regicides commenced on the , before a court of commissioners, of whom some were old royalists; others, such as Manchester, Say, Annesley, and Hollis, had been all members of the Long Parliament; and with these sat Monk, Montague, and Cooper, the associates of Cromwell, who, would think, from motives of delicacy, would have withheld from the tribunal. The prisoners were in number, and included Sir Hardress Waller, Major-General Harrison, Colonel Carew, Cook, Hugh Peters, Scott, Harry Marten, and Scroop, among other scarcely less noticeable names. Waller was called; he pleaded guilty, and thus escaped the scaffold. Harrison's turn came next. Animated by a fervid spirit of enthusiasm, perfectly free from all alloy of worldly motives, he spoke boldly in his defence. said he, His boldness could not save him; he was sentenced to death, and retired saying he had no reason to be ashamed of the cause in which he had been engaged. Colonel Carew's frame of mind was in tune with that of Harrison, and he also was condemned to death. Harry Marten began a most ingenious and persevering defence by taking exception to the indictment. He declared he was not even mentioned in it! It certainly included a name, Henry Marten, but that was not his-his was Marten. This was overruled, and the trial proceeded. The Solicitor-General having said, Marten replied, He then went on to plead that the statute of Henry VIII. exempted from high treason any acting under a king , though he should not be a king . No arguments would move the judge and jury of that day. Marten also was condemned. As for the other prisoners, all of them were found guilty, but those who had surrendered themselves voluntarily were, with exception, that of Scroop, respited. were executed. All, it has been remarked, died with the constancy of martyrs, and it is to be observed that not a single man of those who had a share in the death of the late king seems to have voluntarily repented of the deed. . | |
It was at the trial of the regicides that the ridiculous story was given in evidence by a soldier, who declared that when Harry Marten and Cromwell signed the death-warrant of the king, they wiped their pens on each other's faces. | |
The trial of Lord William Russell for his alleged connection with the Rye House Plot commenced at the on the . He was charged with conspiring the death of the king, and consulting how to levy war against him. As was the case in. the trial of the regicides, there is no doubt that the jury was packed by the sheriffs. Lord Russell desired the postponement of the trial | |
p.467 | till the afternoon, on account of an error in the list of the jury, and of the non-arrival of some witnesses from the country. The Attorney-General, Sir Robert Sawyer, corruptly assuming his guilt as already proven, answered harshly, Desiring to take notes of the evidence, the prisoner asked if he might have assistance. said Sir Robert D. Pemberton, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, who presided, adding,
was the answer, No wonder that a thrill ran through the crowd of spectators when they saw the daughter of the excellent and popular Lord Southampton thus bravely aiding her husband in his defence The incident was not likely to be forgotten, and both painters and poets have long delighted to dwell on the image
|
Every knows how the trial ended, and how the unfortunate but noble-minded Russell was, on the , executed in . | |
The Press-Yard at the still, by its name, commemorates of the cruelties of our old statute-book. In all cases where a criminal refused to plead at the bar, in order to preserve his property from being forfeited to, the Crown, the was used. The most celebrated case of the application of this torture was in , when Major Strangways endured it, to save his estate. He and his elder sister had shared a farm peacefully enough, til the sister married a lawyer named Fussell, whom Strangways disliked. He had been, indeed, heard to say that if ever his sister married Fussell, he would be the death of him in his study, or elsewhere. day Fussell was shot at his lodgings in London, and suspicion fell on Strangways, who consented to the ordeal of touch. At his trial Strangways refused to plead. He wished to bestow his estate on his best friends, and he hoped to escape the ignominy of the gibbet. Lord Chief Justice Glynn then passed the sentence,
| |
On the Monday following Strangways was clothed in white from top to toe, and wearing a mourning cloak (for indeed it was his own funeral to which he was going). His friends placed themselves at the corner of the press, and when he. gave the word, put on the weights. This was done till he uttered the words, but the weight being too light to produce instant death, those present stood on the board, as a ghastly and last act of friendship. The poor fellow bore this some or minutes. | |
After the almost entire abolition of this cruel practice, it was the custom to force the prisoners to plead, if possible, by screwing the thumb with whipcord, a sort of buccaneer form of cruelty. In Mary Andrews was tortured thus. The whipcords broke, but she gave way with the . The same year (for the press was still partially continued) the cord was tried on a criminal named Nathaniel Hawes, who then was pressed under a weight of , and he consented to plead. According to writer on the subject, the cord torture was last used about . | |
A tragic episode in the history of the administration of justice in the was the invasion of the court by the gaol-fever during the sessions of . The gaol-fever raged so violently in the neighbouring prison that the effluvia, entering the court, caused the death of the Judge of the Common Pleas, Sir Thomas Abney, Baron Clark, Pennant the historian's Sir Samuel Pennant, Lord Mayor, and several members of the Bar and of the jury. | |
The occasion of this misadventure, and a few particulars concerning it, have been recorded for the benefit of posterity. A Captain Clarke was being tried for killing a Captain Turner, and the court was unusually crowded. About prisoners were tried, and they were kept all day cooped up in small rooms feet by feet each way, and only feet high. It was remarked that the Lord Chief Justice and the Recorder, who sat on the Lord Mayor's right hand, caught, while the rest of the bench, on the left, escaped, the infection. This was attributed to the draught, that carried the infected air in that direction. Every precaution was afterwards taken, says Pennant, to keep the court airy; but as several of these fatal accidents had already happened in the kingdom, it was rather surprising The disease again proved fatal to several in . | |
p.468 | |
Upon the outbreak of the gaol-fever the custom arose of placing rue in front of the dock of the to prevent infection: so it is stated in Lawrence's (). At the trial of Manning and his wife for murder, it will be remembered that at the conclusion of a speech by of the counsel, Mrs. Manning gathered some of and threw them vehemently over the wigged heads of the gentlemen. | |
Over the court-room is a dining-room, where the judges have long been in the habit of dining when the court was over--a practice commemorated by a well-known line--
| |
says an amusing writer in the for ,
| |
In - the dinners for sessions, days, cost Sheriff Phillips and his colleague per day--; dozen of wine was consumed at these dinners, costing , so that the total of the bill came to . | |
And now we take leave of the [extra_illustrations.2.469.1] , according to Garth, in his
| |
The Old Bailey--that part of the street opposite to Newgate-became the scene of public executions in , on the in which year the culprit suffered here the extreme | |
p.470 | penalty of the law. Before that time the public executions ordinarily took place at Tyburn. The gallows of the was built with cross-beams for as many rows of victims, and between February and , persons suffered by the an ingenious invention which took the place of the cart. On but occasion the old mode of execution was revived; a triangular gallows was set up in the road, opposite , and the cart was drawn from under the criminal's feet. |
The front of Newgate continued to be the place of execution in London from to , when an Act was passed directing executions to take place within the walls of prisons. This Act was the result of a commission on capital punishments, appointed in , which, in their report issued in , recommended, amongst other things, that executions should not be public. The number of executions throughout the country has been gradually decreasing for many years, as our laws have become less severe. In there were fortythree executions in London; in , ; in , ; in ; none; in , none; in , ; in , none; in , ; in , ; in , ; in , none; in , ; in , ; in , ; and from to the average has been per annum. What a contrast this presents to the stern old times when the law of the gallows and the scaffold kept our forefathers in order! In the reign of Henry VIII. -- years--it is said that no fewer than criminals were executed in England! | |
It used to be occasionally the usage to execute the criminal near the scene of his guilt. Those who were punished capitally for the riots of suffered in those parts of the town in which their crimes were committed; and in incendiaries were hanged in , at the eastern end of , opposite the site of the house to which they had set fire. Mr. Timbs observes,
| |
About was witnessed in the the end of an old practice: the body of the criminal just executed was burned for the last time. A woman was the sufferer in this case. She was hung on a low gibbet, and on life being extinct, fagots were heaped around her and over her head, fire was set to the pile, and the corpse was burned to ashes. | |
The memorable executions at the include those of Mrs. Phepoe, for murder, ; Holloway and Haggerty, ; Bellingham, ; Joseph Hunton (Quaker), ; Bishop and Williams, ; John Pegsworth, ; James Greenacre, ; besides several others already mentioned by us as having undergone trial at the adjoining court of justice. | |
A dreadful accident took place here at the execution of Holloway and Haggerty, on the , for the murder of Mr. Steele, on Hounslow Heath, in . persons were crushed to death. We have already alluded to the circumstances, and to our previous notice the following account of the catastrophe, by a writer in the , must be regarded as supplementary:-- The most affecting scene of distress was seen at , nearly opposite the Debtors' Door. | |
Offenders frequently stood in the pillory in the , and there, no doubt, were often, as was customary, stoned by the mob, and pelted with rotten eggs, and other equally offensive missiles. The pillory generally consisted of a wooden frame, erected on a scaffolding, with holes | |
p.471 | |
[extra_illustrations.2.471.1] and folding boards for the admission of the head and hands of him whom it was desired to render thus publicly infamous. Rushworth says that it was invented for the special benefit of mountebanks and quacks, but it seems to have been freely used for cheats of all description. Bakers for making bread of light weight, and were in the olden time upon it. So also were fraudulent corn, coal, and cattle dealers, cutters of purses, sellers of sham gold rings, keepers of infamous houses, forgers of letters, bonds, and deeds, counterfeits of papal bulls, users of unstamped measures, and forestallers of the markets. But just as the Court witnessed occasionally the persecution of the innocent, so the pillory had at time other heroes than cheats, thieves, scandalmongers, and perjurers. says the late Dr. Robert Chambers, Many a courageous and outspoken thinker will occur to every reader of English history as having been set on this scaffold of infamy, to the lasting disgrace of narrow-minded tyranny. | |
The last who stood in the pillory of London was Peter James Bossy, tried for perjury, and sentenced to transportation for years. Previous to being transported he was to be kept for months in Newgate, and to stand for hour in the pillory in the . The pillory part of the sentence was executed on the . | |
An Act of the British Parliament, dated , put an end to the use of the pillory in the United Kingdom. In it had been abolished as a punishment except for perjury. | |
The Surgeons' Hall stood in the , on the site of the New , till . Pennant, in his remarks, in connection with the old Court of Justice, that the erection of the Surgeons' Hall in its neighbourhood was an exceedingly convenient circumstance. he says,
| |
The bodies of murderers, after execution, were dissected in the Surgeons' Theatre, according to an Act passed in , and which was only repealed in the reign of William IV. A curious experiment was performed here, in the beginning of the century, on the body of Foster, who was executed for the murder of his wife. It was says a writer in the for , But the most curious part of the proceedings remains to be told. According to Mr. J. Saunders, in Knight's , when the right arm was raised, as mentioned above, it struck of the officers of the institution, who died that very afternoon of the shock. | |
In , Laurence Earl Ferrers was tried before the , for the murder of his steward. He was found guilty, and sentenced At the latter part of the sentence, we are told, his lordship cried out, but, soon recollecting himself, added, On Monday, the , he was hanged at Tyburn, and the body was conveyed, with some state, in his own landau and , to the Surgeons' Hall, in the , to undergo the remainder of the sentence. A print of the time shows the corpse as it lay here. | |
It was at this hall that Goldsmith presented | |
p.472 | himself in a new suit--not paid for--to be examined as to his qualifications for being a surgeon's mate, on the . says Roderick Random, when he found himself in a similiar condition at that place of torture,
|
says Mr. John Forster,
| |
continues Goldsmith's biographer,
| |
[extra_illustrations.2.472.1] , lived Jonathan Wild, the famous thief-taker, who had a very intimate acquaintance with the . | |
A description of the would be decidedly incomplete were we to omit giving a sketch of the career of this noted inhabitant. Almost every great man arrives at eminence by zeal and energy, devoted to some particular calling; and it may be worth our pains to look for a little at that which Jonathan made peculiarly his own. His occupation was the restoration of stolen goods, carried on from about the year , through a secret confederacy with all the regular thieves, burglars, and highwaymen of the metropolis, whose depredations he prompted and directed. An Act of Parliament, passed in , tended rather to check the display of his peculiar talents. By this Act persons convicted of receiving or buying goods, knowing them to be stolen, were made liable to transportation for years; and by another clause, with a particular view to Wild's proceedings, a heavy punishment was awarded to all who trafficked in such goods and divided the money with felons. Wild's ingenuity and audacity, however, long enabled him to elude this new law. He was of the cleverest of rogues, and it has been well said, in sense, merited the name of bestowed upon him by Fielding, in whose history of him, although the incidents are fictitious, there is no exaggeration of his talents or courage, any more than of his unscrupulousness and want of all moral principle. The plan upon which he conducted his extensive business operations was this. When thieves made prizes of any sort, they delivered them up to him, instead of carrying them to the pawnbroker, and Wild restored the goods to the owners, for a consideration, by which means large sums were raised, and the thieves remained secure from detection. To manage this, he would apply to persons who had been robbed, and pretend to be greatly concerned at their misfortunes, adding that some suspected goods had been stopped by a friend of his, a broker, who would be willing to give them up; and he did not fail to throw out a hint that the broker merited some reward for his disinterested conduct and his trouble, and to exact a promise that no disagreeable consequences should follow on account of the broker's having omitted to secure the thieves as well as the property. The person whose goods had been carried off was generally not unwilling by this means to save himself the trouble and expense of a prosecution, and the money paid was usually sufficient to remunerate the as well as his agent. | |
At last, after he had amassed a considerable sum, he adopted another and a safer plan.. He opened an office, to which great numbers resorted, in the hope of obtaining the restitution of their property. His light was by no means hid under a bushel, and he kept it burning with the greatest credit and profit to himself. Let us suppose some to have had goods stolen of a considerable value. He calls upon Mr. Wild, at his office, and pays half-a-crown for advice. Wild enters his name | |
p.473 | and address in his books, inquires particularly about the robbery, and sounds his client as to the reward he will give in the event of the restitution being made. he says, He calls again. Wild says that he has heard about the goods, but the agent he has employed tells him that the robbers pretend that by pawning them they can raise more money than the amount of the reward. Would it not, he suggests, be a good plan to increase the reward? The client consents, and retires. He calls the time. He has the goods placed in his hands: he pays the reward over to Jonathan, and there is the end of the transaction. |
In the course of this business it will readily be perceived that Wild became possessed of the secrets of every notorious thief about London. All the highwaymen, shoplifters, and housebreakers knew that they were under the necessity of complying with whatever he thought fit to demand. Should they oppose his inclination, they were certain, ere long, to be placed within reach of the clutches of justice, and be sacrificed to the injured laws of their country. Wild led lives, so to speak; amongst ruffians, and the other as a man of consequence, with laced clothes and a sword, before the public eye; and the latter life was as unlike the former as any lives could well be. | |
He professed, in public, to be the most zealous of thief-takers; and to ordinary observation his life and strength seemed devoted to the pursuit and apprehension of felons. At his trial--for his trial came at last-he had a printed paper handed to the jury, entitled, and it contained the names of robbers, housebreakers, and returned convicts, whom he had been instrumental in getting hanged. This statement was probably true enough. In the records of the trials at the , for many years before it came to his own turn, he repeatedly appeared, figuring in the witness-box, and giving evidence for the prosecution, and in many cases he seems to have taken a leading part in the apprehension of the prisoner. | |
In carrying on his trade of blood, Wild, of course, was occasionally turned upon by his betrayed and desperate victim. But, when this happened, his brazen-faced effrontery carried everything before it. In a trial, for example, of unfortunate wretches indicted for several robberies in , he gave the following account of his proceedings :-- The husband of the woman, it appears, had really taken part in of the robberies, though he now came forward to convict his associates, having been, no doubt, all along in league with Wild; and Blake (better known to fame as Blueskin) also figured as king's evidence on this occasion, and frankly admitted that he had been out with the prisoners. The unlucky characters in the dock, while their comrades thus figured in a freer and more pleasant situation, says the account of the trial, vehemently but they were found guilty, and had the pleasure of swinging in company on Tyburn-tree a few days afterwards. | |
But, in all fairness to Jonathan, it must be said that he did not, till the last moment, desert his friends, and that he only sacrificed them for the general good of the concern, and from a bold and comprehensive view of the true policy of trade. Blueskin's turn to be tried, convicted, and hanged, came about a couple of years after the affair just mentioned. Wild was to have been a witness against him; but a day or before the trial, when he went to pay a visit to his intended victim, Blueskin drew out a clasp-knife, and, in a twinkling, fell upon Jonathan, and cut his throat. The blade was too blunt, however, and the thief-taker received no lasting damage. When the verdict was given, Blueskin addressed the court, and told them of an exceedingly kindly promise his late partner had made him. (crimes punishable only by transportation, whipping, imprisonment, &c., were denominated single felonies).
| |
The reward of , it has been explained, which Wild could not manage to make Jacobs bring was part of a system established by various Acts of Parliament, which assigned certain money payments to be made to persons apprehending and prosecuting to conviction highway robbers, coiners, and other delinquents. | |
We come now to the end of Wild's career. He was committed to Newgate on the , on a charge of having assisted a criminal in his escape from prison. In the course of a few days he moved to be either admitted to bail or discharged, but a warrant of detainer was produced against him in court, the of several articles of information affixed to the warrant being, | |
and the and last, that it appeared On Saturday, the , he was brought to trial on separate indictments. The jury found him guilty, and he was sentenced to be executed at Tyburn on Monday, the . On the morning of the execution the wretched man swallowed a dose of poison, but it failed to end his life, and in a state of half-insensibility he was placed in the cart that was to convey him to the gallows. On the way he was pelted by the populace with stones and dirt, and, altogether, this | |
p.475 | |
[extra_illustrations.2.475.1] arch-villain made rather a pitiable exit from this world. At the foot of the gallows he remained so long drowsy in the cart, that the mob called out to the hangman that they would knock him on the head if the hanging was not at once proceeded with. The amiable Jonathan had wives. His eldest son, soon after his father's execution, sold himself for a servant to the plantations. A skull claiming to be the great thief-taker's was exhibited, some years ago, in , but as it was not fractured in several places, it was probably spurious. Wild boasted in prison of the numerous robbers he had captured, and the wounds he had received | |
from them. The body of this infamous fellow was secretly buried. | |
[extra_illustrations.2.475.2] skeleton, says Mr. Timbs, in , was some years since in the possession of a surgeon at Windsor. And a relic of him was judged of sufficient interest to be exhibited to the Society of Antiquaries in . It was a musketoon given by Jonathan Wild to Blueskin, which had fallen into the hands of the well-known magis. trate, Sir John Fielding, and by him had been given to his half-brother, Henry Fielding. | |
In a curious letter was found in the Town Clerk's Office of the city of London, from Jonathan | |
p.476 | |
[extra_illustrations.2.476.1] Wild, asking for remuneration for services he had rendered to the cause of justice. In the same letter, written in , he also prayed the Lord Mayor and the Court of Aldermen in consideration of his valuable services. There is a record that Jonathan Wild's petition was read by the Court of Aldermen, but we do not find evidence that the coveted freedom was awarded to him. Wild's house was long distinguished by the sign of the head of Charles I. | |
In the stood Sydney House, occupied, in the time of Pennant, by a coachmaker. Once it was the proud mansion of the Sydneys. They occupied it till their removal to Leicester House, at the north-east corner of . | |
The names of several eminent personsalto- gether independent of the --occur to us as we perambulate this interesting locality. William Camden, the was born in the , in . His father was a paper-stainer here. In Ship Court, on the west side, Hogarth's father, Richard Hogarth, kept a school. He seems to have come early from the North of England, and was employed in London as a teacher and as a corrector of the press. He was a man of some learning; and Chalmers, writing in , mentions that a dictionary in Latin and English, which he compiled for the use of schools, was then extant in manuscript. At No. , at the corner of Ship Court, William Hone, in , gave to the world this celebrated political parodies on the Catechism, the Litany, and the Creed, for which he was times tried at and acquitted. | |
Peter Bales, the celebrated penman of the time of Queen Elizabeth, kept a writing-school, in , at the upper end of the , and published his here. In a writing competition he once won a golden pen, of the value of , and in addition had the This clever writer had a steady hand, and wrote with such minuteness, that, remarks. D'Israeli, in his he astonished the eyes of beholders, by showing them what they could not see. In the Harleian MSS. () we have a narrative of which seems, by the description, to have been the whole bible the account goes on to say, It is added that this wonderfully unreadable volume was
| |
Prynne's was printed This Little was a kind of in the . It has long been removed. | |
of the courts leading out of the was , which ran from the upper end of the street into . Here were the famous Breakneck Steps referred to by Ward in his when he speaks of This court, now destroyed, was specially interesting as the residence of Oliver Goldsmith, about , a time when the poet was making shift to exist. As to his sojourn here we shall tale the liberty of quoting a graphic passage from Mr. John Forster, of the best of Goldsmith's numerous bio- | |
he says, --the proprietor of the , to which the poet was at this time contributing-- (Mr. Forster is writing in ),
| |
It was in this lodging that the poet received a visit from Percy, then busily engaged in collecting material for his famous The graye church dignitary discovered Goldsmith in his wretched room busily writing. There being but chair it was, out of civility, offered to the visitor, and Goldsmith was himself obliged to sit in the window. Whilst the were sitting talking together- Percy relates in his memoir--some was heard to rap gently at the door, and being desired to come in, a poor ragged little girl of very decent behaviour entered, who, dropping a curtsey, said,
| |
Footnotes: [extra_illustrations.2.462.2] Old Sessions House [extra_illustrations.2.464.1] Trial in Old Bailey [extra_illustrations.2.464.2] Central Criminal Court [extra_illustrations.2.469.1] Central Criminal Court [extra_illustrations.2.471.1] Pillory near London Bridge [extra_illustrations.2.472.1] At what used to be No. 68 of the Old Bailey [extra_illustrations.2.475.1] Led to Execution [extra_illustrations.2.475.2] Jonathan Wild's [extra_illustrations.2.476.1] Westminster Magazine in old Bailey |