Old and New London, A Narrative of its History, its People and its Places. Illustrated with Numerous Engravings from the Most Authentic Sources. vol 3
Thornbury, Walter
1872-78
Chapter IX:The Strand--Introductory and Historical.
Chapter IX:The Strand--Introductory and Historical.
| |
During the reign of Henry VIII. an active stir had commenced for the reparation of streets and highways in and about the metropolis, and the necessity for such improvement is fully shown by the words of the royal statute which was then enacted for the purpose. In granting permission to lay out a new road in the Weald of Kent, which formed an important thoroughfare to London, we are told that Nor in approaching London was the case improved, in several instances at least; for the suburban districts, as yet only villages separated from the City by fields, gardens, and a sprinkling of cottages, were connected with the City by a highway, often left in grievous disrepair through the negligence of the inhabitants. Such was the case even with that great artery of the metropolis--the Strand--of which we are about to treat. | |
Frequented though it was, and necessary for the comfort of the City, yet this highway, in the and years of Henry VIII., is described as a road There is extant somewhere or other in the Rolls of Parliament, a complaint of the high-road between the Temple being so deep in mire as to be almost impassable. In fact it had earned a thoroughly bad character. It was described in the statute above quoted as By this route, however, Cardinal Wolsey, when residing in , used to ride down to Hall, in all the magnificence which befitted a as already described in the volume of this work (page ). | |
In speaking, however, of the disgraceful condition of the high-road between London and , in the days of the Plantagenets, we are in danger, perhaps, of forgetting the fact that at that time the traffic along it consisted mainly of foot passengers, or riders on horseback, carriages being then almost as unknown as hansom cabs or omnibuses. Elizabeth, as we know, rode usually on a pillion, even on state occasions, and years after her, we are told, there were only vehicles on wheels in the whole of London. No wonder, therefore, that many of our old thoroughfares are still narrow in the extreme. | |
In the present admirably-paved state of the streets of the metropolis, the following statement relative to the Strand, , and , must appear strange:--
| |
In there were hackney coaches in London; but they multiplied so rapidly, that in years afterwards Government took the alarm at their general use, and endeavoured to limit it; upon the plea that these carriages It was therefore ordered But the time had gone by when such despotic edicts were in force; and Cromwell himself, we are told, was destined soon after to drive -in-hand, in Jehu fashion, through this forbidden territory, and be capsized for his pains. | |
Scarcely had this innovation been commenced in London, when Taylor, the who plied a scull upon the Thames, exclaimed, Speaking of the coaches, he adds, Alluding also to the confusion produced by this startling civic revolution, he adds,
| |
The scene presented by the thoroughfare of the Strand, through its entire length, if we may believe such an eyewitness as John Evelyn, was very gay and brilliant. He writes in his Diary,
| |
To pass on to a somewhat later date, we are told by Malcolm that when, in , the number of hackney carriages in London was limited by Act of Parliament to , the inhabitants of the Strand and petitioned against any increase in their numbers, on the ground that
| |
During the time of Queen Elizabeth, considerable improvement had been effected by the filling up of the gaps or blanks left between the dwellings that had already been built along the Strand; and by the end of her long reign, both sides of this line of route had been nearly covered with the mansions of the nobility, so that may be said at that time to have been joined on to London. The still rural character, however, of the districts abutting on the north side, at the time when the Strand was only an unpaved road, may be gathered from the existence to our own day of such names as the Convent (Covent) Garden, , St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, and , most of which were open country at the date of the earliest existing map of the metropolis. | |
The name of the Strand is clearly of Saxon andnot of Norman origin; and, if we may trust a writer in the , it is mentioned by name in the Saxon Chronicle. And as a proof of the statement it is recorded that upon the Strand Earl Godwin and his son Harold drew up their land forces in the insurrection which they headed against Edward the Confessor, in A.D. . | |
We find this thoroughfare sometimes spoken of as as, for instance, in the lease by which Sir Wm. Cecil agrees to take his property in this neighbourhood for a term of years from the Earl of Bedford. The lease is printed in the thirtieth volume of the
| |
The following graphic sketch, which we take from , carries us back to the Strand of years ago:-- | |
| |
Between the Strand and the river-side there are or great and noble families whose names and histories are interwoven with the vicinity. Nearest to , the Devereuxes, Earls of Essex; next the Howards, of the ducal family of Norfolk; then the Protector Somerset, the Cecils, Earls of Salisbury and Exeter, and Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, to say nothing of the proud line of Percy, Dukes of Northumberland, who up to have kept up their town residence at . About and all of these in succession we shall have plenty to say in the next few pages. | |
Mr. A. Wood, in his tells us that The site is fixed by its garden, which is now Covent Garden. | |
The town house of the Duke of Beaufort in the reign of Charles II. stood here, on the site of what now are known as ; but the family removed thence to Beaufort House at in . Then there was Essex House, and the Inn of the Bishops of Norwich (afterwards York House), which as far back as the reign of Edward III. spread out their embattled fronts towards the Strand, while their extensive gardens, terraces, and water-stairs sloped down to the river. Spelman says that in the troublous times of the Tudors most of the houses of the prelates in the Strand were taken from them by courtiers
| |
Among the characteristic features of the Strand at this period were the bridges that spanned the various water-courses flowing from the meadows and open fields on the north, and crossing this thoroughfare in their way to the Thames. or of these bridges were kept in remembrance down to comparatively recent times in the names of Ivy and Strand , of the latter of which-now simply Strand Lanewe shall have to speak presently, in connection with the old Roman bath which is situated there. Then there was the stone cross, of which old Stow speaks as being situated in front of the spot now occupied by , and which in its turn gave place to the famous Maypole, thus alluded to in the and of which we shall speak hereafter:--
| |
Stow states that the Liberty of the Duchy of Lancaster extended from to the east side of , near what is now the , and from the stocks just outside to over against the Maypole in the Strand, and along by Exeter Change and . | |
The foot-pavement of this quarter of the town, as well as of other parts of , would seem to have been in a deplorable state as recently as the year , when a new paving Act was passed. Until that time, it appears, every inhabitant did before his own house just what was right in his own eyes, without rule or plan. The consequence was that some parts of the footway were paved admirably, some indifferently, and some were left unpaved-mere pools of mud and water-according to the wealth or caprice of each resident. A proof of the general filth of this part of the Strand may be found in the of the time, where we read, of the new measure of reform,
| |
In the description of the Strand given by him in , Pennant complains of the street as being in some places too narrow for the incredible number of persons and carriages passing through it. | |
The Strand has witnessed in its day some strange and curious sights. For instance, we read that Queen Elizabeth, when she rode into the City, sat on a pillion behind her Lord Chancellor, wagons and the newly-invented carriages being in disfavour with her Majesty. Among the numerous pageants which the thoroughfare of the Strand has witnessed may be mentioned the procession of Queen Elizabeth in state to , to return thanks for the victories over the Spanish Armada. Queen Anne passed this way in state to on several occasions, to commemorate victories over France and Spain. In there was a state visit to the City to celebrate the victory of Blenheim; and in like manner have been commemorated the victories of Ramillies and other important triumphs. Then there was the religious ceremonial when George III. and his consort went in state to to offer a nation's thanks for its king's recovery; the solemn conveyance of captured banners and the great naval procession to , headed by the King, in ; the funeral procession of Lord Nelson in , and that of the Duke of Wellington in ; and the visits of Queen Victoria, when she went in state to dine at , and to open the new , and, in , to return public thanks for the restoration of the health of the Prince of Wales. | |
But probably none of these pageants ever presented a scene so striking as when the gates of were opened at the approach of the Charles on his restoration, and the King, brought back to his own again, rode gallantly through the City to . The houses of the Strand were adorned with the richest tapestry, and window, balcony, and scaffold were crowded with | |
p.63 [extra_illustrations.3.63.1] [extra_illustrations.3.63.2] | all that was beautiful and loyal. The streets were lined with members of the City companies in their liveries, and the loud music of the trained-bands, and the din of the bells from a steeples, were drowned in the cheers of the enthusiastic populace. This event appears all the more impressive when contrasted with the rueful spectacle presented by just years later, when the heads of the most devoted followers of the house of Stuart were exposed over its gates, as if in bitter derision of the monarchs of the exiled Stuart line whose effigies adorn its niches. |
As we have already stated, the appearance of at the present time () is sufficient to impress any passenger along the Strand, in his way to the City, with its utterly hopeless prospect. Temple Bar-almost the last relic of the geographical sovereignty of Londonlooks now as if it really needed friends, and its aspect is forlorn and hopeless in the extreme, and amply sufficient to justify our reprinting the following lines, written on the report of removing in :--
| |
But it is time to pass from these general remarks to a more detailed account of the thoroughfare of which we treat. [extra_illustrations.3.63.3] | |
Footnotes: [extra_illustrations.3.63.1] Bill head- John Burgess and son- 107 Strand [extra_illustrations.3.63.2] Elmer Judkins and E.S. Judkins [extra_illustrations.3.63.3] Hotel Cecil- Strand |