Old and New London, A Narrative of its History, its People and its Places. Illustrated with Numerous Engravings from the Most Authentic Sources. vol 3

Thornbury, Walter

1872-78

Chapter XLIII: Whitehall and its Historical Associations (continued).Warrant for Execution of Charles I.

Chapter XLIII: Whitehall and its Historical Associations (continued).Warrant for Execution of Charles I.

 

Parte alia lautas aedes, magna atria regum

Cernere erit.

When the was erected, it was little thought that James was constructing a passage from it for his son and successor, Charles I., to the scaffold. It would be unpardonable to pass over an event of this magnitude slightly, especially at a time like the present, when so much is said and written on the subject of monarchical government and republicanism. Rapin has impartially laid down what has been said for and against the proceedings of the Parliament in their quarrel with Charles I., which led to the establishment of the Commonwealth. Mr. Nightingale, in

The Beauties of England and Wales,

describes the matter as follows, from a more partial point of view :--

The unfortunate monarch was evidently the prey of

two

contending parties: the Independents, whose descendants still survive in the various sects now called Calvinistic Methodists; and the Presbyterians, who are now risen or degenerated into the sects of Unitarians, Arians, and General Baptists. The

first

of these parties was bent on the king's destruction; the latter wished to save him, and eventually brought about the restoration of Charles II., though they could not succeed in saving the life of his father. The rebellious army had the support of the Independents; but it should not therefore be concluded that the king had the cordial support of the Presbyterians, whom nothing would satisfy but the abolition of the episcopacy, though they do not seem to have wished this at the expense of their monarch's life.

On the , the voted:--

1

. That the government of the kingdom should be still by the King, Lords, and Commons.

2

. That the groundwork for this government should be the propositions last presented to the king at

Hampton Court

.

3

. That any member of the House should have leave to speak freely to any votes, ordinances, or declarations concerning the king, &c.

These votes did not at all accord with the designs of the Independents, who meant to abolish all kingly authority, and establish a Commonwealth; and who, although weak in the House, but strong in the field, contrived to prevent a reconciliation or treaty with the king till Cromwell should be sufficiently strong to allow them to act with the necessary vigour against their enemiesthe Scots, the Royalists, and the Presbyterians. In the meanwhile Cromwell gained strength, and the Independents at length openly demanded

that the king be brought to justice, as the capital cause of all the evils in the kingdom, and of so much blood being shed.

Everyday gave new force to their designs, and new strength to their vengeance. They had possession of the king's person, and removed him, contrary to the instructions of the Parliament, to Hurst Castle, in Hampshire.

On the -, the king, who had in the meantime been removed from Hurst Castle to Windsor, was brought to St. James's. His trial was quickly hurried on, and on the sentence of death was passed upon him. His Majesty was taken back to , and [extra_illustrations.3.347.3]  into effect days afterwards upon a scaffold erected [extra_illustrations.3.347.4] . Mr. J. H. Jesse thus minutely describes the last sad scene:--

Colonel Hacker having knocked at his door and informed him that it was time to depart, Charles took Bishop Juxon by the hand, and bidding his faithful attendant Herbert to bring with him his silver clock, intimated to Hacker, with a cheerful countenance, that he was ready to accompany him. As he passed through the Palace Garden into the Park, he inquired of Herbert the hour of the day, bidding him at the same time keep the clock for

his

sake.

The procession

was a remarkable

one

. On each side of the king marched a line of soldiers, while before him and behind him were a guard of halberdiers, their drums beating and colours flying. On his right hand was Bishop Juxon, and on his left hand Colonel Tomlinson, both bareheaded. There is a tradition that during his walk he pointed out a tree, not far from the entrance to

Spring Gardens

, which he said had been planted by his brother Henry. He was subjected to more than

one

annoyance during his progress. On reaching the spot where the

Horse Guards

now stand, Charles ascended a

staircase which then communicated with

Whitehall

Palace, and passing along the famous gallery which at that time ran across the street, was conducted to his usual bedchamber, where he remained till summoned by Hacker to the scaffold.

This day,

according to a contemporary MS.,

his Majesty died upon a scaffold at

Whitehall

. His children were with him last night. To the Duke of Gloucester he gave his George; to the Lady Elizabeth his ring off his finger. He told them his subjects had many things to give

their

children, but that was all he had to give them. This day, about

one

o'clock, he came from St. James's in a long black cloak and grey stockings. The Palsgrave came through the Park with him. He was faint, and was forced to sit down and rest in the Park. He went into

Whitehall

the usual way out of the Park, and so came out of the Ban-

Queen Elizabeth. (From The Portrait By Zucchero, L575.)

queting House upon planks, made purposely to the scaffold. He was not long there, and what he spoke was to the

two

bishops, Dr. Juxon and Dr. Morton. To Dr. Juxon he gave his hat and cloak. He prayed with them, walked twice or thrice about the scaffold, and held out his hands to the people. His last words, as I am informed, were, To your power I must submit, but your authority I deny. He pulled his doublet off, and kneeled down to the block himself. When some officer offered to unbutton him, or some such like thing, he thrust him from him.

Two

men, in vizards and false hair, were appointed to be his executioners. Who they were is not known. Some say he that did it was the common hangman; others, that it was

one

Captain Foxley, and that the hangman refused. The Bishop of London had been constantly with him since sentence was given. Since he died they

have made proclamation that no man, upon pain of I know not what, shall presume to proclaim his son Prince Charles as King; and this is all I have yet heard of this sad day's work.

It has often been denied that the of was the actual scene of the execution of King Charles I. But the fact that the sad scene was witnessed by [extra_illustrations.3.349.1]  from the roof of Wallingford House, which stood on the spot now occupied by the Admiralty, establishes the precise locality.

The Archbishop,

says his biographer,

lived at my Lady Peterborough's house, near

Charing Cross

; and on the day that King Charles was put to death he got upon the leads, at the desire of some of his friends, to see his beloved sovereign for the last time. When he came upon the leads the King was in his speech; he stood motionless for some time, and sighed, and then, lifting up his tears to heaven, seemed to pray very earnestly. But when his Majesty had done speaking, and had pulled off his cloak and doublet, and stood stripped in his waistcoat, and that the villains in vizards began to put up his hair, the good Bishop, no longer able to endure so horrible a sight, grew pale and began to faint; so that if he had not been

Whitehall Yard.

observed by his own servant and others that stood near him, he had fainted away. So they presently carried him down and laid him upon his bed.

The warrant for the execution, too, expressly commanded that the bloody deed should take place

in the open street before

Whitehall

.

Mr. J. W. Croker denied that this was the actual scene, on the ground that

the street in front of the Banqueting House did not then exist.

The contemporary prints, however, show that Croker was in error in this assertion, for the high road from to ran then, as now, under the very windows of the Banqueting Hall. Mr. J. H. Jesse confirms, by the evidence of his own eyes, the assertion of George Herbert (who attended the king to the last), that

a passage was broken through the wall by which the king passed unto the scaffold.

He writes:--

Having curiosity enough to visit the interior of the building, the walls of which were then [at the renovation of the Banqueting House] laid bare, a space was pointed out to the writer between the upper and lower centre windows, of about

seven

feet in height and

four

in breadth, the bricks of which presented a broken and jagged appearance,

and the brick work introduced was evidently of a different date from that of the rest of the building. There can be little doubt that it was through this passage that Charles walked to the fatal stage.

Pennant confirms the circumstantial account given above, stating that the passage broken in the wall in order to make a passage for Charles to the scaffold still remained when he wrote, forming the door to a small additional building of later date.

It is on record, and attested on all hands, that the king walked to the scaffold with a cheerful countenance and a firm and undaunted step, as whose conscience told him that he died in a good cause and with a good conscience. Thus it comes to pass that who certainly was no partisan of Charles I., or an advocate of the

divine right of kings,

Andrew Marvell, penned such lines as these:

While round the armed bands

Did clasp their bloody hands,

He nothing common did, or mean,

Upon that memorable scene,

Nor called the gods, with vulgar spite,

To vindicate his hopeless right;

But with his keener eye

The axe's edge did try;

Then bowed his kingly head

Down, as upon a bed.

In a rare book, called

Gleanings,

by R. Groves, published in , we find noticed the following coincidence, which is certainly singular, if true:

King Charles was beheaded in that very place where the

first

blood was shed in the beginning of our late troubles ; for a company of the citizens returning from

Westminster

, where they had been petitioning quietly for justice, were set upon by some of the Court as they passed

Whitehall

: in the which tumult divers were hurt and

one

or more were slain just by the Banqueting House, in the place where stood the scaffold on which he suffered. 'Tis further remarkable,

adds the writer,

that he should end his days in a tragedie at the Banqueting House, where he had seene and caused many a comedy to be acted on the Lord's Day.

By a signal providence,

says Wheatley,

the bloody rebels chose that day for murdering their king on which the history of our Saviour's sufferings (Matt. xxvii.) was appointed to be read as a lesson. The blessed martyr had forgot that it came in the ordinary course; and therefore, when Bishop Juxon (who read the morning office immediately before his martyrdom) named this chapter, the good prince asked him if he had singled it out as fit for the occasion: and when he was informed it was the lesson for the day, could not without a simple complacency and joy admire how suitably it concurred with his circumstances.

Whilst holding that the execution of the king was a murder and a sin, we cannot go so far with the Royalists as to endorse the exaggerated sentiments of the following epitaph, which we find in the

Eikon-Basilike,

published in , when the irritation against the regicides was at its highest pitch:

So falls the stately cedar; while it stood,

That was the onely glory of the wood;

Great Charles, thou earthly god, celestial man,

Whose life, like others, though it were a span,

Yet in that span was comprehended more

Than earth hath waters, or the ocean shore;

Thy heavenly virtues angels should rehearse,

It is a them too high for humane verse.

Hee that would know thee right, then let him look

Upon thy rare-incomparable book,

And read it or'e and or'e, which if he do,

Hee'll find thee king, and priest, and prophet too,

And sadly see our losse, and though in vain,

With fruitlesse wishes, call thee back again.

Nor shall oblivion sit upon thy herse,

Though there were neither monument nor verse.

Thy suff'rings and thy death let no man name;

It was thy glorie, but the kingdom's shame.

A question has often been asked, who was the executioner of Charles I.? We do not mean, who were the men at whose bidding the deed was done?-for their names have come down to posterity, with lasting dishonour as

the regicides

----but, whose hand actually dealt the blow? There are undoubtedly very strong reasons for believing that it was Richard Brandon, a resident in , the entry of whose death occurs in the register of , Whitechapel, under date . To the entry is appended a note, evidently of about the same date, to the effect that

this R. Brandon is supposed to have cut off the head of Charles the

First

.

This man is said to have been the son of Gregory Brandon, who beheaded Lord Strafford, and may therefore be said to have claimed the gallows as his inheritance. Besides, in the

Confessions of Richard Brandon, the Hangman

(), we meet with the following passage :--

He [Brandon] likewise confessed that he had

thirty pounds

for his pains, all paid him in half-crowns within an hour after the blow was given, and that he had an orange stuck full of cloves and a handkercher out of the king's pocket, so soon as he was carried from the scaffold, for which orange he was proffered

twenty shillings

by a gentleman in

Whitehall

, but refused the same, and afterwards sold it for

ten shillings

in

Rosemary Lane

.

If this indeed be true, it is satisfactory to know that the man who struck the cruel and fatal blow did not long survive the deed. He was buried in Whitechapel churchyard; and it was with

p.351

great difficulty that his interment was effected, so strong was the popular loathing against him. Various authorities, however, at different times, have charged with the deed Dun (styled in of Butler's poems

Squire Dun

), Gregory Brandon, William Walker, Richard Brandon, Hugh Peters, Colonel Joyce, William Hewlett, and lastly, Lord Stair. Against some of these the accusation is utterly groundless. According to Sir Nathaniel Wraxall, George Selwyn,

that insatiable amateur of executions,

told the story of King Charles's execution from information which he professed to have obtained from the Duchess of Portsmouth, who, he said,

always asserted, on the authority of Charles the

Second

, that the king, his father, was not beheaded by either Colonel Joyce or Colonel Pride, as was then commonly believed; but that the real name of the executioner was

Gregory

Brandon; that this man had worn a black crape stretched over his face, and had no sooner taken off the king's head than he was put into a boat at

Whitehall Stairs

, together with the block, the black cloth that covered it, the axe, and every others article that had been stained with the royal blood. Being conveyed to the Tower, all the implements used in the decapitation had been immediately reduced to ashes. A purse containing

one hundred

broad pieces of gold was then delivered to Brandon, and he was dismissed. He survived the transaction many years, but divulged it a short time before he died. This account,

Wraxall adds,

as coming from the Duchess of Portsmouth, challenges great respect.

By Lilly's Life it would appear that the man who acted as the executioner of Charles I. was Lieut.-Colonel Joyce; but whether it was Joyce's or Brandon's hand that shed the king's blood, it is a satisfaction to let their names go down together to posterity in these columns stamped with the infamy and disgrace of

 
 
Footnotes:

[] Banqueting House of Whitehall

[extra_illustrations.3.347.3] the sentence was carried

[extra_illustrations.3.347.4] in front of the Banqueting House of Whitehall

[] Great Seal of Commonwealth

[extra_illustrations.3.349.1] Archbishop Usher

[] See Vol. II., p. 143.

This object is in collection Subject Temporal Permanent URL
ID:
bz60d6473
Component ID:
tufts:UA069.005.DO.00062
To Cite:
TARC Citation Guide    EndNote
Usage:
Detailed Rights
View all images in this book
 Title Page
 Introduction
 Chapter I: Westminster--General Remarks-Its Boundaries and History
 Chapter II: Butcher's Row--Church of St. Clement Danes
 Chapter III: St. Clement Danes (continued):--The Law Courts
 Chapter IV: St. Clement Danes (continued)--A Walk Round the Parish
 Chapter V: The Strand (Northern Tributaries)--Clement's Inn, New Inn, Lyon's Inn, etc
 Chapter VI: The Strand (Northern Tributaries)--Drury Lane and Clare Markets
 Chapter VII: Lincoln's Inn Fields
 Chapter VIII: Lincoln's Inn
 Chapter IX: The Strand--Introductory and Historical
 Chapter X: The Strand:--Southern Tributaries
 Chapter XI: The Strand:--Southern Tributaries (continued)
 Chapter XII: The Strand:--Southern Tributaries (continued)
 Chapter XIII: The Strand:--Southern Tributaries (continued)
 Chapter XIV: St. Mary-Le-Strand, The Maypole, &c
 Chapter XV: Somerset House and King's College
 Chapter XVI: The Savoy
 Chapter XVII: The Strand:--Southern Tributaries (continued)
 Chapter XVIII: The Strand:--Northern Tributaries
 Chapter XIX: Charing Cross, The Railway Stations, and Old Hungerford Market
 Chapter XX: Northumberland House and its Associations
 Chapter XXI: Trafalgar Square, National Gallery, &c
 Chapter XXII: St. Martin's-in-the-Fields
 Chapter XXIII: Leicester Square and its Neighbourhood
 Chapter XXIV: Soho
 Chapter XXV: Soho Square and its Neighbourhood
 Chapter XXVI: St. Giles's in the Fields
 Chapter XXVII: The Parish of St. Giles's-in-the-Fields (continued)
 Chapter XXVIII: Drury Lane theatre
 Chapter XXIX: Covent Garden Theatre
 Chapter XXX: Covent Garden:--General Description
 Chapter XXXI: Covent Garden (continued)
 Chapter XXXII: Covent Garden and its Neighbourhood (continued)
 Chapter XXXIII: Covent Garden and its Neighbourhood (continued)
 Chapter XXXIV: Covent Garden and its Neighbourhood (continued)
 Chapter XXXV: Covent Garden and its Neighbourhood (continued)
 Chapter XXXVI: Covent Garden and its Neighbourhood (continued)
 Chapter XXXVII: The River Thames
 Chapter XXXVIII: The River Thames (continued)
 Chapter XXXIX: The River Thames (continued)
 Chapter LX: The Victoria Embankment
 Chapter XLI: Scotland Yard and the Metropolitan Police
 Chapter XLII: Whitehall--Historical Remarks
 Chapter XLIII: Whitehall and its Historical Associations (continued)
 Chapter XLIV: Whitehall and its Historical Associations (continued)
 Chapter XLV: Whitehall--The Buildings Described
 Chapter XLVI: Whitehall, and its Historical Reminiscences (continued)
 Chapter XLVII: Whitehall:--Its Precinct, Gardens, &c
 Chapter XLVIII: Whitehall--The Western Side
 Chapter XLIX: Westminster Abbey--Its Early History
 Chapter L: Westminster Abbey--Historical Ceremonies
 Chapter LI: Westminster Abbey--A Survey of the Building
 Chapter LII: Westminster Abbey--The Choir, Transepts, &c.
 Chapter LIII: Westminster Abbey--The Chapels and Royal Tombs.
 Chapter LIV: Westminster Abbey--The Chapter House, Cloisters, Deanery, &c.
 Chapter LV: Westminster School
 Chapter LVI: Westminster School (continued)
 Chapter LVII: The Sanctuary and the Almonry
 Chapter LVIII: The Royal Palace of Westminster
 Chapter LIX: The New Palace, Westminster
 Chapter LX: Historical Reminiscences of the Houses of Parliament
 Chapter LXI: New Palace Yard and Westminster Hall
 Chapter LXII: Westminster Hall--Incidents in its Past History
 Chapter LXIII: The Law Courts and Old Palace Yard
 Chapter LXIV:Westminster--St. Margaret's Church