Kenna's Kingdom: a Ramble Though Kingly Kensington

Brown, R. Weir

1881

CHAPTER XI. HOLLAND HOUSE.

CHAPTER XI. HOLLAND HOUSE.

 

HOLLAND HOUSE is the chief glory of Kenna's kingdom; yet it possesses so marked an individuality of its own, that we might at first feel inclined to fancy we had over-strayed the boundaries of that kingdom altogether. It is like some lofty mountain height, standing so much apart from the main group as to seem more like a detached summit than what it really is-the highest peak of the range. The only other building in Kenna's kingdom, which at all approaches in point of historical interest, is the Palace, and the palace falls short-very far short-of it, in the freshness and pleasantness of its memories. will lead us not into what is usually

208

considered the historic main road, as the Palace did; yet we shall fare none the worse for having as companions, authors and statesmen, instead of kings and queens, for spending our time with the nation rather than with the court. The celebrities of Holland House demand more critical consideration than most of those whom we have as yet met in our rambles, and we shall not hesitate to adopt a somewhat graver style befitting better our new companions. Let us then, as privileged ramblers, pass through the iron gates which face Kensington High Road, along the avenue of lofty elms, and when arrived in front of the house, pause to take a mental survey of our forthcoming excursion.

At first we may experience some little surprise and some confusion at the number of persons whom the enchanter's wand, Memory, calls before us. Moneylenders of the reign of James the First, gallants of the time of the two Charles', travellers, quakers, seventeenth century players, roundheads, and cavaliers, Puritans and Presbyterians, painters, wits, authors, men of science, men of letters, lawyers, poets, and statesmen. Take for instance the names of those who are intimately associated with one apartment alone, the library.

209

Machiavelli, Addison, Lope de Vega, Madame de Sevigne, Locke, Franklin, the Empress Catherine, Robespierre.

The various ages, opinions and anecdotes which such groups of names suggest, may at first sight appear incongruous, but if we throw these nominal masses into our minds, and allow a few days for the mental threshing machine to perform its duty, we shall be surprised to find how the whole jumble has classified and arranged itself, and now appears to represent a natural sequence of events. This sequence does not commence until the seventeeth century, for we do not believe has much association with the nameless traditionary mansion of the De Veres, of which some traces are said to be still extant in Holland Park. It owes it origin to one of the money-lenders of James the First's reign-Sir Walter Cope. The builder was one John Thorpe, as is mentioned in the docket of a plan of the house, preserved by Walpole, which runs, "Sir Walter Coape's, at Kensington, erected by I. T."; but the house was afterwards altered and added to by Inigo Jones and Stone. It was commenced in . Sir

210

Walter was, no doubt owing to certain pecuniary transactions, in good favour with the Court. He was a Gentleman of the Bedchamber to the King. The old money-lender's daughter Isabella, must have been considered a catch at the time, for we are told that the Earl of Carlisle, the all-powerful favourite of the king, " preferred " his greatest friend, the Earl of Holland, to her hand.

" By this marriage," says Clarendon, "the Earl became possessed of a good fortune, and, amongst other things, the manor and seat of Kensington, of which he was shortly made baron."

, first Baron Kensington, then, is the first well-defined figure which has for its background. His career is an interesting one. He was typical of a class of men not uncommon in the days of the Civil Wars, and by no means extinct. The earl was younger son of the noble house of Rich; In his youth he had served as a volunteer in the war in Holland. The favours, however, which his handsome mien, his winning ways, and fluent tongue, procured him from the king were, joined with his wife's portion, sufficiently substantial to enable him to

211

abandon the life of a soldier for that of a courtier. His new occupation suited him well. He was rapidly advanced to the earldom of Holland, made Captain of the Guard, Knight of the Order, and of the Privy Council, while the fact of his having been the Ambassador chosen to treat concerning the King's marriage, had procured him the good opinion of the Queen. So long as the nation remained quiet he was distinguished principally by his readiness to carry out the unconstitutional measures of Charles for his own profit; yet, when the volcano of rebellion burst forth, he gave but a half-hearted support to his royal master, intriguing with the Parliament so as to be ready for whatever might happen. When the Covenanters encamped at Dunse in , it was Holland who commanded of the royal forces sent to disperse them, and it was Holland who fled without striking a blow. The king made him General of the Forces, and the first use he made of his position was to send words of warning to the House of Commons, the king's adversaries. When at length Charles' standard was raised at Nottingham, in , Holland was not among its defenders. But a year later he deserted

212

the Parliament, and joined Charles at Oxford. In this line of conduct he himself saw no reason for shame, nay, rather he was convinced that the merits of a deserter far outshone those of a staunch adherent. Accordingly, having fought bravely in the king's regiment at Newbury, he looked for a restoration of all his old places and honours; But Charles naturally enough distrusted him, and was impolitic enough to show that distrust. Holland's old place of the Groom of the Stole was not restored to him, but was given to the Earl of Hertford. Then the Earl again changed sides. Before he was missed at Oxford, he was in London. He gave the Parliament to understand that he had deserted simply to incline his majesty to a treaty of peace, but finding the king surrounded by evil counsellors, had returned even at the risk of his life. The Parliament sequestered his estate, and mistrustingly placed him in a dishonourable confinement in his own mansion, . Five years later, towards the close of the great struggle, when the turn of affairs must have convinced the Earl that nothing but danger could be expected from the party of Cromwell, he once more declared in favour of the king. He headed

213

a rising of some five hundred men, and was taken prisoner in a struggle at St. Neots, where some better men than himself fell.

In the ensuing January Charles was brought to the scaffold, and shortly afterwards the Earl, too, was tried and condemned. He vainly endeavoured by his conciliatory demeanour, by petition, and by interest, to save his life, but when the end came, he died well and bravely, making many edifying reflections, and compounding with the executioner for his "cloathes" for ten pounds. As the aforesaid " cloathes " included a white satin waistcoat and white satin cap with silver lace, the executioner may not have made so good a bargain. "He was," says Clarendon, who makes many highly moral remarks on his fate and character, a very well-bred man, and a fine gentleman in good times; but too much desired to enjoy ease and plenty . . . when the king could have neither, and did think poverty the most insupportable evil that could befall any man in this world." Had his lot been cast in less troublesome times, he would probably have made a good and prosperous lord of the manor of the Copes, and a successful and honoured courtier. He

214

could not, however, bear the fiery ordeal of revolution and indecision, selfishness, deceit, and want of patriotism are so apparent in his history, that had he not been so fine a gentleman, and dressed so well, he would seem a very despicable man indeed. Five months later had for an occupant, whether as lodger or temporary possessor, it is difficult to say, General Fairfax. It is rumoured that in the July of the same year another parliamentary general. Lambert, also had quarters here. If tradition say true, Cromwell too discussed the state of the nation with Ireton on the lawn. There is at all events no proof to the contrary.

At length, with unusual lenity the Parliamentarians allowed the widow of the beheaded Earl to live again at . Her ladyship appears to have found time and money for making alterations and additions, if we may judge by the following inscription on a stone dug up near the stables in .

" This side done by ye la. Holland A.D. ."

She is also said to have given great encouragement to the strolling players, who were as much patronised by the Royalists as they were severely handled by the

215

Puritans. A statute for their suppression sagely remarking, " That whereas the acting of Stage Plays, Interludes, and common Plays is condemned by antient Heathens (?) it is much less to be tolerated amongst professors of the Christian religion." During the time of Lady Holland there was no house in which the players were more kindly or more frequently received than in the old manor of the Copes. Isabella's son, Richard, second Earl of Holland and fifth Earl of Warwick, resided principally there. His son and successor, Edward, married Charlotte, daughter of Sir Thomas Middleton, a lady better known through her second husbandJoseph Addison. But we have travelled somewhat too fast, Addison is not on the tapis yet. Holland House boasts of one or two noteworthy visitors before him. It seems, indeed, to have been occasionally let or lent to various personages, among whom at this period figure the names of Sir John Chardin, Oriental traveller, and William Penn, Quaker, and founder of Pennsylvania.

John Chardin was a French Protestant, whom the revocation of the Edict of Nantes drove to English

216

shelter, in . Here he was well received by Charles the Second, who knighted him. During his stay at , the place probably became a temporary museum, and numerous must have been the visitors who would throng to hear his traveller's tales. Evelyn tells us that in his lodgings he assumed the Eastern dress, was a very handsome person, extremely affable, modest, well-bred, and not inclined to talk wonders. He spoke Latin, and understood Greek, Arabic, and Persian, and had travelled throughout those parts of the East where few, if any, Europeans used to go. He told Evelyn of the fireworshippers in Persia, praised the women of Georgia as the most beautiful in the world, and remarked that in the former country there was little use of iron, it being so moist there that " oyle would not preserve it from rusting; so that they had neither clocks nor watches; but some padlocks they had for doores and for boxes." A daughter was borne here in , whose name appears in the Parish Register. Chardin was apparently succeeded in the occupation of by William Penn. William Penn has two characters, and it is strange that his

217

greatest critic, , should himself have been almost as much connected with as Penn himself.

Here is Penn's biography in Magnall's questions, the biography which the children of last generation, and many of the present, have been, and are taught:

"William Penn, a celebrated Quaker, born in London, ; died, . He colonized the province of Pennsylvania, built the town of Philadelphia, and was deservedly esteemed by the good of all persuasions."

Now a few words from as a commentary.

" Unhappily, it cannot be concealed that he bore a chief part in some transactions condemned not merely by the rigid code of the society to which he belonged, but by the general sense of all honest men."

The aspersions of raised a storm of opposition, but they have never been disproved, and the whole affair is a warning against the danger of hero-worship. History is never tired of showing us that heroes, such heroes, at least, as man loves to make of his fellow-man, are few and far between, if

218

they exist at all. But Penn, after all, though not a saint was a good man. He was not, perhaps, quite the sober Quaker that he is usually represented, and appears to have lived in considerable style at Holland House. On some mornings that house was thronged by not less than two hundred suitors, so that he could scarcely make his way down the steps. His influence with the king was great, and, as a rule, he used it wisely and well. He was a good and great man, and had people not insisted on canonizing him as a hero, his faults would never have assumed the glaring proportions into which the revelations of forced them.

Chronologically, William Penn, as an inmate of , was succeeded by a man of whom formed a very different estimate to that which he did of Penn. This was Joseph Addison, poet, essayist, and statesman.

But was a portrait painter who loved to sketch his characters in black and white; he never used neutral tint. He has made a moral sweep of William Penn, he has made a moral miller of James Addison. Yet to a large, to a very large extent

219

Addison deserves the praise that has been lavished on him. We are the more careful to admit this as the poet does not, perhaps, shine his brightest when in connexion with . His marriage with the Countess was not a happy one. , it was said, although a large house, could not contain Mr. Addison, the Countess of Warwick and one guest-Peace. The fault seems to have been chiefly on the lady's side. Addison appears to have formed her acquaintance whilst residing at Chelsea. We have elsewhere referred to the tradition that he was tutor to the Countess's son, the young Earl of Warwick. The courtship was a lengthy one, disparity of rank being the obstacle, nor when the union ultimately took place did this objection disappear. "At length," says Dr. Johnson, pompously cynical, "the lady was persuaded to marry him, on terms much like those on which a Turkish princess is espoused, to whom the Sultan is reported to pronounce 'Daughter, I give thee this man for thy slave.'" In our own day it would scarcely be considered a mesalliance for a Countess to marry the son of a Dean and landholder in Warwickshire, the brother of the Governor of Madras,

220

and the first writer of his age, who besides had filled some of the highest posts in the Civil Service of his country, and who, not long after the marriage became Secretary of State. A disparity between the Dowager Countess of Warwick and Addison !-a great one truly-for the lady owes the circumstance of her name being still remembered to the fact that the despised commoner was her husband. Poor Addison, always shy and mild, was henpecked and, if tradition say true, would often spend his evenings in the little neighbouring inn, the Holland Arms, where he and some of the friends of his bachelor days might enjoy a bottle of claret and a little literary conversation. It is as the death-place of the great writer that is chiefly celebrated. Here, on the , he died, deeply regretted by his friends, and by none more so than Tickell, whose lines on the subject are worth reading, as the following extract will show:

"Thou Hill-whose brow the antique structures grace

Rear'd by bold chiefs of Warwick's noble race,

Why, once so lov'd, whene'er thy bower appears,

O'er my dim eyeballs glance the sudden tears !

How sweet were once thy prospects fresh and fair,

Thy sloping walks, and unpolluted air !

How sweet the glooms beneath thy aged trees,

Thy noontide shadow and thy evening breeze !

His image thy forsaken bow'rs restore,

Thy walks and airy prospects charm no more;

No more the summer in thy glooms allay'd,

Thy evening breezes, and thy noonday shade.

The story of Addison's death-bed is well known, to some portions of it we have already alluded. How serenely he died; how he is said to have attempted to read a lesson to his step-son, the young Earl of Warwick, in the memorable words "See in what peace a Christian can die," how he sent for Gay, the poet, to , and implored his forgiveness for some wrong which Addison had, or fancied he had, inflicted on his brother poet, and the secret of which is unknown to the present day, and how in his forty-eighth year the great essayist passed away, with the peaceful trust in God of some little sinless childall this, and more than this has been told and retold, and is still worth the telling. Addison was buried in Westminster Abbey.

" Ne'er to these chambers where the mighty rest,

Since their foundation came a nobler guest,

Nor e'er was to the bow'rs of bliss conveyed

A fairer spirit or more welcome shade."

222

 

This of course is the partiality of friendship and the license of a poet.

A great poet Addison was not. He was no orator; he showed but little talent as a statesman, his dramatical productions, regarded from a dramatic point of view, were but second rate; his learning though extensive, was not remarkable. Yet as a writer of pure, clear, lucid English prose, he is probably unequalled. He was almost the originator of the essay, he was a humorist of the first water, and a satirist without being a cynic. He was a sincere moralist, a brilliant conversationalist, and a good man. His influence on the men and manners of his age was as great as the influence of any writer on the men and manners of any particular age has been, and it was an influence that was always exerted in the cause of morality, of humanity, and of learning. It was however, only among his chosen friends that his sparkling wit and conversational wealth displayed themselves. With strangers he was mute, and in his own words "he could draw a bill for a thousand pounds, though he had not a guinea in his pocket." Indeed Lord Chesterfield declares that 'he was the

223

most timorous and awkward man that he ever saw."

Many memorials of Addison are treasured at , and most of the rooms are more or less connected with his name. There is the present dining room, a fine old fashioned apartment, with richly laden sideboard, and pictures by Reynolds, Kneller, and Lely-here Addison died. There is the library, upwards of ninety feet in length, bay-windowed at either end, containing within its bookcases treasures priceless to the antiquary, the bibliomaniac, and the literary man, manuscripts of Lope de Vega, music copied by Jean Jaques Rouseau, when he in this manner, earned a miserable subsistence, and books of value innumerable. To this room belongs the story of Addison's pacings to and fro, with a bottle of wine at either end, and assisting the muse, by regularly taking a glass from each bottle. The story may or may not be true. Horace Walpole, indeed, caps the touching account of his death as commonly received, with the sarcastic words, " Unfortunately, he died of brandy." The brandy, at all events, if it did not assist, at least did not spoil Addison's papers in the Spectator Considering the habitual intemperance

224

of the age in which he lived, Addison does not seem to have drunk more, or so much as most of his contemporaries, which is but a faint qualification, if any at all. In this same apartment, the library, is preserved Addison's table, small, simple, and ink-blotted, and in the library passage is a portrait of him. But there have not been wanting cavillers to prove that the portrait is not the portrait of Addison, but of somebody else, so that we leave our readers to decide here as they choose, just as in the case of the brandy story. It was at that Milton's daughter paid Addison a visit.

After the death of Addison, still remained in the possession of the Warwick family. On the death of the young earl, which took place in the year following that of his stepfather, his cousin, William Edwardes, afterwards Baron Kensington, became possessed of the property, and under him the house appears to have been let or lent as frequently as before. Among these temporary tenants were Shippen, the plain, downright honest Jacobite, , the Whig lawyer, of whom we have spoken in connection with Campden House, and the daughter

225

of Atterbury, the celebrated Bishop of Rochester, perhaps, indeed, Atterbury himself. At all events, his library was there, and a room for him, whether occupied or not. At length passed from the hands of the Warwick family. It was leased in to Henry Fox, first Lord Holland, who purchased it in .