Old and New London, A Narrative of its History, its People and its Places. Illustrated with Numerous Engravings from the Most Authentic Sources. vol I
Thornbury, Walter
1872-78
Cheapside-Introductory And Historical.
Cheapside-Introductory And Historical.
What a wealth and dignity there is about [extra_illustrations.1.304.1] ; what restless life and energy; with what vigorous pulsation life beats to and fro in that great commercial artery! How pleasantly on a summer morning that last of the Mohicans, the green plane-tree now deserted by the rooks, at the corner of , flutters its leaves! How fast the crowded omnibuses dash past with their loads of young Greshams and future rulers of ! How grandly Bow steeple bears itself, rising proudly in the sunshine! How the great webs of gold chains sparkle in the jeweller's windows! How modern everything looks, and yet only a short time since some workmen at a foundation in , feet below the surface, came upon traces of primeval inhabitants in the shape of a deer's skull, with antlers, and the skull of a wolf, struck down, perhaps, more than a years ago, by the bronze axe of some British savage. So the world rolls on: the times change, and we change with them. | |
[extra_illustrations.1.304.2] is from of the most ancient representations extant of . It shows the street decked out in holiday attire for the procession of the wicked old queen-mother, Marie de Medici, on her way to visit her son-in-law, Charles I., and her wilful daughter, Henrietta Maria. | |
The City records, explored with such unflagging interest by Mr. Riley in his furnish us with some interesting gleanings relating to . In the old letter books in the Guildhall--the Black Book, Red Book, and White Book-we see it in storm and calm, observe the vigilant and jealous honesty of the guilds, and become witnesses again to the bloody frays, cruel punishments, and even the petty disputes of the middle-age craftsmen, when was glittering row of goldsmiths' shops, and the very heart of the wealth of London. The records culled so carefully by Mr. Riley are brief but pregnant; they give us facts uncoloured by the historian, and highly suggestive glimpses of strange modes of life in wild and picturesque eras of our civilisation. Let us take the most striking | |
In the candle-makers seem to have taken a fancy to , where the horrible fumes of that necessary but most offensive trade soon excited the ire of the rich citizens, who at last expelled of the craft from their sheds in Chepe. In the year of Edward II. it was ordered and commanded on the king's behalf, that (probably about m.); and the same year it was forbidden, under pain of imprisonment, to scour pots in the roadway of Chepe, to the hindrance of folks who were passing; so that we may conclude that in Edward II.'s London there was a good deal of that out-door work that the traveller still sees in the back streets of Continental towns. | |
Holocausts of spurious goods were not. uncommon in . In (Edward II.) we find that at the request of the hatters and haberdashers, search had been made for traders selling that is, of false and dishonest workmanship, made of a mixture of wool and flocks. The result was the seizure of grey and white hats, and black) which were publicly burnt in the street of Chepe. What a burning such a search would lead to in our less scrupulous days! Why, the pile would reach half way up . Illegal nets had been burnt opposite in the previous reign. After the hats came a burning of fish panniers defective in measure; while in the reign of Edward III. some false chopins (wine measures) were destroyed. This was rough justice, but still the seizures seem to have been far fewer than they would be in our boastful epoch. | |
305 | |
There was a generous lavishness about the royalty of the Middle Ages, however great a fool or scoundrel the monarch might be. Thus we read that on the safe delivery of Queen Isabel (wife of Edward II.), in , of a son, afterwards Edward III., the Conduit in Chepe, for day, ran with nothing but wine, for all those who chose to drink there; and at the [extra_illustrations.1.305.1] , hard by the church of St. Michael in West Chepe, there was a pavilion extended in the middle of the street, in which was set a tun of wine, for all passers-by to drink of. | |
The mediaeval guilds, useful as they were in keeping traders honest (Heaven knows, it needs supervision enough, now!), still gave rise to jealousies and feuds. The sturdy craftsmen of those days, inured to arms, flew to the sword as the quickest arbitrator, and preferred clubs and bills to Chancery courts and Common Pleas. The stones of Chepe were often crimsoned with the blood of these angry disputants. Thus, in (Edward III.), the saddlers and the joiners and bit-makers came to blows. In May of that year armed parties of these rival trades fought right and left in and Cripplegate. The whole city ran to the windows in alarm, and several workmen were killed and many mortally wounded, to the great scandal of the City, and the peril of many quiet people. he conflict at last became, so serious that the mayor, aldermen, and sheriffs had to interpose, and the dispute had to be finally settled at a great discussion of the trades at the , with what result the record does not state. | |
In this same reign of Edward III. the excessive length of the tavern signs ( as they were then called) was complained of by persons riding in . All the taverners of the City were therefore summoned to the , and warned that no sign or bush (hence the proverb, ) should henceforward extend over the king's highway beyond the length of feet, under pain of a fine of to the chamber of the . | |
In (Edward III.) more guilds fell to quarrelling. This time it was the pelterers (furriers) and fishmongers, who seem to have tanned each other's hides with considerable zeal. It came at last to this, that the portly mayor and sheriffs had to venture out among the sword-blades, cudgels, and whistling volleys of stones, but at with little avail, for the combatants were too hot. They soon arrested some scaly and fluffy misdoers, it is true; but then came a wild rush, and the noisy misdoers were rescued; and, most audacious of all, Thomas, son of John Hansard, fishmonger, with sword drawn (terrible to relate), seized the mayor by his august throat, and tried to lop him on the neck; and brawny rascal, John le Brewere, a porter, desperately wounded of the City serjeants: so that here, as the fishmongers would have observed, For striking a mayor blood for blood was the only expiation, and Thomas and John were at once tried at the , found guilty on their own confession, and beheaded in Chepe; upon hearing which Edward III. wrote to the mayor, and complimented him on his display of energy on this occasion. | |
Chaucer speaks of [extra_illustrations.1.305.2] :
| |
In the luxurious reign of Richard II. the guilds were again vigilant, and set fire to a number of caps that had been oiled with rank grease, and that had been frilled by the feet and not by the hand, In this same reign (), when the air was growing dark with coming mischief, an ordinance was passed, prohibiting secret huckstering of stolen and bad goods by night instead of the appointed markets held every feast-day, by daylight only, in Westchepe and . The Westchepe market was held by day between St. and a house called between the and bell, and special provision was made that at these markets no crowd should obstruct the shops adjacent to the open-air market. To close the said markets the was to ring a bell (probably, says Mr. Riley, the bell on the Tun, at ) twice-, an hour before sunset, and another final half an hour later. Another civic edict relating to markets occurs in (Richard II.), when the stands for stalls at the High Cross of Chepe were let by the mayor and chamberlain at each. At the same time the stalls round the brokers' cross, at the north door of (erected by the Earl of Gloucester in Henry III.'s reign) were let at ios. and each. The stationers, or vendors in small wares, on the taking down of the Cross in , probably retired to . | |
The punishment of the pillory (either in | |
306 | or ; the does not say which) was freely used in the Middle Ages for scandal-mongers, dishonest traders, and forgers; and very deterring the shameful exposure must have been to even the most brazen offender. Thus, in Richard II.'s reign, we find John le Strattone, for obtaining by means of a forged letter, was led through Chepe with trumpets and pipes to the pillory on for hour, on successive days. |
For the sake. of classification we may here mention a few earlier instances of the same ignominious punishment. In (Edward III.) Nicholas Mollere, a smith's servant, for spreading a lying report that foreign merchants were to be allowed the same rights as freemen of the City, was set in the pillory for hour, with a whetstone hung round his neck. In the same heroic reign Thomas Lanbye, a chapman, for selling rims of base metal for cups, pretending them to be silvergilt, was put in the pillory for hours; while in (Richard II.) we find Roger Clerk, of Wandsworth, for pretending to cure a poor woman of fever by a talisman wrapped in cloth of gold, was ridden through the City to the music of trumpets and pipes; and the same year a cook in , for selling stale slices of cooked conger, was put in the pillory for an hour, and the said fish burned under his rascally nose. | |
Sometimes, however, the punishment awarded to these civic offenders consisted in less disgraceful penance, as, for instance, in the year (Richard II.), a man named Highton, who had assaulted a worshipful alderman, was sentenced to lose his hand; but the man being a servant of the king, was begged off by certain lords, on condition of his walking through Chepe and , carrying a lighted wax candle of ' weight to St. Dunstan's Church, where he was to offer it on the altar. | |
In , the year Elizabeth sent her rash but brave young favourite, Essex, with men, to help Henry IV. to besiege Rouen, fanatics named Coppinger and Ardington, the former calling himself a prophet of mercy and the latter a prophet of vengeance, proclaimed their mission in , and were at once laid by the heels. But the old public punishment still continued, for in (the year before the execution of Essex) we read that by sentencing that lady to be whipped in ; while a Captain Hermes was sent to the pillory, his brother was fined lIoo and imprisoned, and Gascone, a soldier, was sentenced to ride to the pillory with his face to the horse's tail, to be there branded in the face, and afterwards imprisoned for life. | |
In , when Elizabeth was coquetting with Anjou and the French marriage, we find in of those careful lists of the Papists of London kept by her subtle councillors, a Mr. Loe, vintner, of the , who married Dr. Boner's sister (Bishop Bonner?). In , the year before, the defeat of the Armada, and when Leicester's army was still in Holland, doing little, and the very month that Sir William Stanley and Englishmen surrendered Deventer to the Prince of Parma, we find the Council writing to the Lord Mayor about a mutiny, requiring him
| |
In the reign of James I. the same ignominious and severe punishment continued, for in Floyd (for we know not what offence) was fined , sentenced to be whipped to the pillories of and , to be branded in the face, and then imprisoned in Newgate. | |
To return to our historical sequence. In (Richard II.) it was ordered that every person selling fish taken east of should sell the same at the market; while all Thames fish caught west of the bridge was to be sold near the conduit in Chepe, and nowhere else, under pain of forfeiture of the fish. | |
The year of Richard II. brought a real improvement to the growing city, for certain were then allowed to build a new water-conduit near the church of St. Michael le Quern, in Westchepe, to be supplied by the great pipe opposite St. Thomas of Accon, providing the great conduit should not be injured; and on this occasion the Earl of Gloucester's brokers' cross at was removed. | |
Early in the reign of Henry V. complaints were made by the poor that the brewers, who rented the fountains and chief upper pipe of the conduit, also drew from the smaller pipe below, and the brewers were warned that for every future offence they would be fined In the year of this chivalrous monarch a named Benedict Wolman, under-marshal of the Marshalsea, was condemned to death for a conspiracy to bring a man named Thomas Ward, Trumpington, from Scotland, to pass him off as Richard II. | |
307 308 | Wolman was drawn through and to the gallows at Tyburn, where he was
|
Lydgate, that dull Suffolk monk, who followed Chaucer, though at a great distance, has, in his ballad of described Chepe in the reign of Henry VI. The hero of the poem says-
| |
In the traders of the Goldsmiths' Company began to complain that alien traders were creeping into and alloying the special haunts of the trade, Goldsmiths' Row and ; and that foreign goldsmiths were selling counterfeit jewels, engrossing the business and impoverishing its members. | |
City improvements were carried with a high hand in the reign of Charles I., who, determined to clear of all but goldsmiths, in order to make the eastern approach to grander, committed to the Fleet some of the alien traders who refused to leave . This unfortunate monarch seems to have carried out even his smaller measures in a despotic and unjustifiable manner, as we see from an entry in the State. Papers, . It is a petition of William Bankes, a tavern-keeper, and deposes:--
| |
The foolish determination to make more glittering and showy seems again to have struck the weak despot, and an order of the Council () goes forth that- all the shops in are to be occupied by none but goldsmiths; and all the goldsmiths who keep shops in other parts of the City are to resort thither, or to or . | |
The next year we find a tradesman who had been expelled from Goldsmiths' Row praying bitterly to be allowed a year longer, as he cannot find a residence, the removal of houses in , , and having rendered shops scarce. | |
In the king returns again to the charge, and determines to carry out his tyrannical whim by the. following order of the Council :-- The Council
| |
In we discover from a letter of the Dutch ambassador, Van Goch, to the States-General, that a great fire in , had burned houses. In this reign the market seems to have given great vexation to the tradesmen. In there is a State Paper to this effect :--
| |
Pepys, in his inimitable gives us interesting glimpses of -- of the fermenting times immediately preceding the Restoration, the other a few years later-showing the effervescing spirit of the London 'prentices of Charles II.'s time:-- | |
309 |
|
has been the scene of great riots, which were threatening enough to render them historically important. The was in the reign of Richard I., the other in that of Henry VIII. he of these, a violent protest against Norman oppression, was no doubt fomented, if not originated, by the down-trodden Saxons. It began thus :--On the return of Richard from his captivity in Germany, and before his fiery retaliation on France, a London citizen named William with the Long Beard ( Fitzosbert, a deformed man, but of great courage and zeal for the poor), sought the king, and appealing to his better nature, laid before him a detail of great oppressions and outrages wrought by the Mayor and rich aldermen of the city, to burden the humbler citizens and relieve themselves, especially at when any taxes or tollage were to be levied. Fitzosbert, encouraged at gaining the king's ear, and hoping too much from the generous but rapacious Norman soldier, grew bolder, openly defended the causes of oppressed men, and thus drew round him daily great crowds of the poor. | |
says Holinshed,
| |
How far this English Rienzi intended to obtain redress by. force we cannot clearly discover; but he does not seem to have been a man who would have stopped at anything to obtain justice for the oppressed-and that the Normans were oppressors, till they became real Englishmen, there can be no doubt. The rich citizens and the Norman nobles, who had clamped the City fast with fortresses, soon barred out Longbeard from the king's chamber. he Archbishop of Canterbury especially, who ruled the City, called together the rich citizens, excited their fears, and with true priestly. craft persuaded them to give sure pledges that no outbreak should take place, although he denied all belief in the possibility of such an event. The citizens, overcome by his oily and false words, willingly gave their pledges, and were from that time in the archbishop's power. The wily prelate then, finding the great demagogue was still followed by dangerous and threatening crowds, appointed burgesses and other spies to watch Fitzosbert, and, when it was possible, to apprehend him. | |
These men at a convenient time set upon Fitzosbert, to bind and carry him off, but Longbeard was a hero at heart and full of ready courage. Snatching up an axe, he defended himself manfully, slew of the archbishop's emissaries, and flew at once for sanctuary into the Church of St. Mary Row. Barring the doors and retreating to the tower, he and some trusty friends turned it into a small fortress, till at last his enemies, gathering thicker round him and setting the steeple on fire, forced Longbeard and a woman whom he loved, and who had followed him there, into the open street. | |
As the deserted demagogue was dragged forth through the fire and smoke, still loth to yield, a son of the burgess whom he had stricken dead ran. forward and stabbed him in the side. The wounded. man was quickly overpowered, for the citizens, afraid, to forfeit their pledges, did not come to his. aid as he had expected, and he was hurried to the Tower, where the expectant archbishop sat ready | |
310 | to condemn him. We can imagine what that drum-head trial would be like. Longbeard was at once condemned, and with of his adherents, scorched and smoking from the fire, was sentenced to be hung on a gibbet at the Elms. For all this, the fermentation did not soon subside; the people too late remembered how Fitzosbert had pleaded for their rights, and braved king, prelate, and baron; and they loudly exclaimed against the archbishop for breaking sanctuary, and putting to death a man who had only defended himself against assassins, and was innocent of other crimes. The love for the dead man, indeed, at last rose to such a height that the rumour ran that miracles were wrought by even touching the chains by which he had been bound in the Tower. He became for a time a saint to the poorer and more suffering subjects. of the Normans, and the place where he was beheaded in was visited as a spot of special holiness. |
But this riot of Longbeard's was but the threatening of a storm. A tempest longer and more terrible broke over on in the reign of Henry VIII. Its origin was the jealousy of the Lombards and other foreign money-lenders and craftsmen entertained by the artisans and prentices of London. Its actual cause was the seduction of a citizen's wife by a Lombard named Francis de Bard, of . The loss of the wife might have been borne, but the wife took with her, at the Italian's solicitation, a box of her husband's plate. The husband demanding his wife and then his plate, was flatly refused both. he injured man tried the case at the , but was foiled by the intriguing foreigner, who then had the incomparable rascality to arrest the poor man for his wife's board. | |
says Holinshed,
| |
This bill complained vehemently of the poverty of London artificers, who were starving, while the foreigners swarmed everywhere; also that the English merchants were impoverished by foreigners, who imported all silks, cloth of gold, wine, and iron, so that people scarcely cared even to buy of an Englishman. Moreover, the writer declared that foreigners had grown so numerous that, on a Sunday in the previous Lent, he had seen strangers shooting together at the popinjay. He also insisted on the fact of the foreigners banding in fraternities, and clubbing together so large a fund, that they could overpower even the City of London. | |
Lincoln having won over Dr. Bell to read the complaint, went round and told every he knew that shortly they would have news; and excited the 'prentices and artificers to expect some speedy rising against the foreign merchants and workmen. n due time the sermon was preached, and Dr. Bell drew a strong picture of the riches and indolence of the foreigners, and the struggling and poverty of English craftsmen. | |
The train was ready, and on such occasions the devil is never far away with the spark. The Sunday after the sermon, Francis de Bard, the aforesaid Lombard, and other foreign merchants, happened --to be in the King's Gallery at Greenwich Palace, and were laughing and boasting over Bard's intrigue with the citizen's wife. Sir Thomas Palmer, to whom they spoke, said, and William Bolt, a merchant, added, And that saying the other merchants affirmed. This tale was re, ported about London. | |
The attack soon came. says Holinshed,
| |
says the chronicler,
| |
[extra_illustrations.1.314.1] that beautiful but frail woman, who married a goldsmith in , and was the mistress of Edward IV., was the daughter of a merchant in . Drayton describes her minutely from a picture extant in Elizabeth's time, but now lost. | |
says' the poet,
| |
An old ballad quaintly describes her supposed death, following an entirely erroneous tradition:--
| |
[extra_illustrations.1.315.1] , however, distinctly mentions Jane Shore being alive in the reign of Henry VIII., and seems to imply that he had himself seen her. says More,
| |
Footnotes: [extra_illustrations.1.304.1] Cheapside [extra_illustrations.1.304.2] The engraving which we give on page 307 [extra_illustrations.1.305.1] cross [extra_illustrations.1.305.2] the restless 'prentices of Cheap (Edward III.) [extra_illustrations.1.314.1] Jane Shore [extra_illustrations.1.315.1] Sir Thomas More |
