THE UBHI CASE DOES NOT SIGNIFY THAT CLAIMS BASED ON ETS EXPOSURE ARE LEGALLY VIABLE

1991-00-00

Qb98mr98g?file=thumbnail
open in viewer
Description
  • Report on Ubhi v. State Compensation Insurance Fund. Finds that secondhand smoke exposure at Ubhi's workplace could not be considered a cause of his heart attack.
This object is in collection Personal name Temporal Permanent URL
ID:
p2677656q
Component ID:
tufts:UA084.2023584238
To Cite:
DCA Citation Guide    EndNote
Usage:
Detailed Rights