Evaluation and Regulation of Household Water Treatment Technologies in Developing Countries
Murray, Anna.
2017
-
Abstract: Household water treatment (HWT) technologies are used to improve
microbiological water quality and reduce diarrheal disease among users without access to
safe drinking water. There is ongoing interest in developing new HWT technologies, which
are typically evaluated by controlled laboratory microbiological efficacy testing, followed
by diarrheal disease reduction through randomized c... read moreontrolled trials. In households,
technologies should be both microbiologically effective and consistently used to achieve
maximum health gains, yet industry standard metrics to evaluate household use are lacking.
HWT technology regulation is limited both globally and nationally; few regulation
frameworks exist, and most existing performance standards focus on efficacy. Given the
state of rapid HWT technology development, lack of industry standard metrics, and weak
regulation frameworks, this dissertation aimed to investigate methodologies of evaluating
HWT technology performance for both technology improvement and regulatory decision-making.
Six research projects spanning laboratory, field, and policy domains were conducted: two
evaluations of field laboratory methods for analyzing water quality indicators; three field
evaluations of existing and prototype HWT technologies, including investigations of use,
performance, and failure mechanisms in realistic household settings; and one demonstration
of a national HWT regulation framework considering technology efficacy, toxicity,
manufacturing consistency, and usability. Results confirmed field water quality test
methods, recommended standard HWT evaluation metrics and evaluations in realistic settings,
and demonstrated a simple national HWT regulation framework. Overall, six main themes
emerged: 1) evaluations in realistic settings are important, particularly to identify
design flaws and establish technological limitations before widely distributing
technologies; 2) there is a need to refine HWT field evaluation methods and regularly
report consistent use and effectiveness alongside disease reduction; 3) determining HWT
"success" remains difficult in disparate field study settings; 4) HWT regulation must begin
with basic parameters; 5) technology is important, but behavior change cannot be ignored if
health gains are to be achieved; and finally, 6) HWT is a complex public health
intervention depending on many actors. HWT technologies are a viable solution, but it is
critical that technologies be evaluated and regulated to ensure they are effective for
those who need it most.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tufts University, 2017.
Submitted to the Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Advisor: Daniele Lantagne.
Committee: Elena Naumova, Jeffrey Griffiths, Joe Brown, and Mark Woodin.
Keyword: Environmental engineering.read less - ID:
- 794088590
- Component ID:
- tufts:23100
- To Cite:
- DCA Citation Guide EndNote
